Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 784 So. 2d 43 - State v. Branch

784 So. 2d 43 - State v. Branch’s Empirical Analysis

2001

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
December 2016
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 748 So. 2d 1210 - State v. Moten · 769 So. 2d 1247 - State v. Bentel

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “|3The motion to quash was never properly before the trial judge, and the motion in the record does not provide any grounds on which the trial judge could properly have ruled on the constitutionality of the two predicate DWI convictions. We find that the record, as it stands, simply does not allow review of a ruling regarding whether the two convictions may be used as the basis of an enhanced charge.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.