Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

784 So. 2d 451

Patterson v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2000-03-22

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently August 2017

2 state decisions

Relies on Bennett v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2000-03-22

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1Barrington Patterson appeals from the trial court’s denial of his 3.800 motion. We affirm the denial of the motion finding that the issues raised lack merit. With regard *452to the issue of whether the Department of Corrections has properly credited Patterson with 392 days credit for time served in accordance with the trial court’s order, we note that the defendant must first exhaust the administrative remedies provided by the Department of Corrections. Bennett v. State, 732 So.2d 1130, 1131 n. 1 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999). Accordingly, this affirmance is without prejudice to Patterson re-raising this issue once he has exhausted the administrative remedies provided by the Department of Corrections.

¶2Affirmed.

/784/so2d/451 · .json · Public domain