Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 784 So. 2d 529 - State v. Shaw

784 So. 2d 529 - State v. Shaw’s Empirical Analysis

2001

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
January 2009
most recently cited

9 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Katz v. United States · Ornelas v. United States · Whren v. United States · California v. Carney · 357 So. 2d 410 - McNamara v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “comes to the appellate court with a presumption of correctness, so that we must interpret the evidence and reasonable inferences and deductions in a manner most favorable to sustaining the trial court's ruling.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Deference is given to findings of fact unless they are clearly erroneous, whereas the application of the law to the facts is subject to de novo review .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “In evaluating search and seizure issues, Florida courts are bound by the Fourth-Amendment precedents of the United States Supreme Court.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.