784 So. 2d 529 - State v. Shaw’s Empirical Analysis
2001
Citation profile
9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
January 2009
most recently cited
9 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Katz v. United States · Ornelas v. United States · Whren v. United States · California v. Carney · 357 So. 2d 410 - McNamara v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“comes to the appellate court with a presumption of correctness, so that we must interpret the evidence and reasonable inferences and deductions in a manner most favorable to sustaining the trial court's ruling.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“Deference is given to findings of fact unless they are clearly erroneous, whereas the application of the law to the facts is subject to de novo review .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“In evaluating search and seizure issues, Florida courts are bound by the Fourth-Amendment precedents of the United States Supreme Court.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrencee.g. Vitale v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.