Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

784 So. 2d 619

Foskey v. Foskey

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2001-05-21

Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently April 2019

1 district · 8 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2001-05-21

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1Having carefully reviewed the entire record, we conclude that (1) the trial court’s findings of fact are- supported by competent substantial evidence; (2) there is no error of law which requires reversal; and (3) given the most unusual facts of this case, we are unable to say that the trial court abused its discretion in any way. Accordingly, the supplemental final judgment is affirmed.

¶2AFFIRMED.

WEBSTER, DAVIS, and BENTON, JJ., CONCUR.
/784/so2d/619 · .json · Public domain