784 So. 2d 712 - Rhodes v. Lewis’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

1 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “We find this case almost identical to Volion v. Baker Heritage, Inc., 97-92 (La.App. 5 Cir. 5/28/97) ; 695 So.2d 1038 . In Volion the judgment of the OWC judge established the claimant's entitlement to workers' compensation benefits, but it did not adjudicate the type or amount of those benefits. Our brethren of the Fifth Circuit, with whom we agree, relied on [ Smith v. UNR Home Products, 614 So.2d 54 at 54-55 (La. 1993)], a recent supreme court decision, to dismiss the appeal before them.... * * * In the case sub judice, the extent of Claimant's injuries, the nature of his disability and the amount of compensation to which he is entitled, if any, plus his entitlement to medical care and rehabilitation services all remain undecided.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 817 So. 2d 64 - Rhodes v. Lewis