784 So. 2d 884 - King v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2001
Citation profile
59
cited by 59 later decisions
2
states following
August 2018
most recently cited
56 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Witherspoon v. Illinois · Wainwright v. Witt · Ake v. Oklahoma · Adams v. Texas · Maynard v. Cartwright
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 59 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“You should consider and weigh any aggravating and mitigating circumstances, as set forth later in this instruction, but you are cautioned not to be swayed by mere sentiment, conjecture, sympathy, passion, prejudice, public opinion or public feeling.”
6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence“The state and the defendant and/or his counsel shall be permitted to present arguments for or against the sentence of death.”
6 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. King v. State · Galloway v. State“[B]ecause the instruction does not inform the jury that it must disregard in toto sympathy ... the instruction is a proper statement of the law.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.