Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 784 SO2D 966 - Robinson v. State

Robinson v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2000

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
December 2007
most recently cited

6 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Solem v. Helm · 574 So. 2d 685 - McQuarter v. State · Neal v. State · 536 So. 2d 1336 - Reed v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “failed to inform the Court of what these mitigating factors may be, it is impossible to say that defense counsel was in error in not arguing these supposed factors.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “Entrapment instructions are not necessary where a defendant was merely asked to sell the substance and he was caught.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.