Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 784 SW2D 257 - Stewart v. Sturms

Stewart v. Sturms’s Empirical Analysis

1989

Citation profile

17
cited by 17 later decisions
1
states following
July 2014
most recently cited

17 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently July 2014

17 state decisions

1101989199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Wilkes v. Missouri Highway & Transportation Commission · State Ex Rel. St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Co. v. Buder · Barbieri Ex Rel. Barbieri v. Morris · Smith v. Welch · Sparks v. Consolidated Aluminum Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “However, an assignment of error made for the first time in a reply brief does not preserve that issue for review.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.