Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 785 F.2d 1249

785 F.2d 1249’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

261
cited by 261 later decisions
2
states following
December 2017
most recently cited

32 federal appellate · 6 district · 3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 261 later decisions — most recently December 2017 · most notably Boroff v. Tully (1987), Koch Refining v. Farmers Union Central Exchange, Inc. (1987)

32 federal appellate · 6 district · 3 state decisions

12001980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Johnson v. Georgia Highway Express, Inc. · Ohralik v. Ohio State Bar Assn. · Central Illinois Public Service Co. v. United States · Woods v. City Nat Bank & Trust Co of Chicago · In the Matter of First Colonial Corp. Of America, Bankrupt. American Benefit Life Insurance Company, Appellants-Cross-Appellees v. Franz J. Baddock, Trustee, Appellee-Cross-Appellant. In the Matter of First Colonial Corp. Of America, Bankrupt. Bert K. Robinson v. American Benefit Life Insurance Company

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 261 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “There is no question that the purpose of the incorporation of the disinterest requirement of 11 U.S.C. § 327 was to prevent even the appearance of a conflict irrespective of the integrity of the person or firm under consideration. Certainly a ‘disinterested’ person should be divested of any scintilla of personal interest which might be reflected in his decision concerning estate matters.”
    9 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[T]he trustee, with the court’s approval, may employ one or more attorneys, accountants, appraisers, auctioneers, or other professional persons, that do not hold or represent an interest adverse to the estate, and that are disinterested persons, to represent or assist the trustee in carrying out the trustee’s duties under this title.”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[ Professionals engaged in the conduct of a bankruptcy case should be free of the slightest personal interest which might be reflected in their decisions concerning matters of the debtor’s estate or which might impair the high degree of impartiality and detached judgment expected of them during the course of administration.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.