Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 785 F.2d 1467 - Ross v. Kemp

Ross v. Kemp’s Empirical Analysis

785 F.2d 1467 · 1986

Citation profile

55
cited by 55 later decisions
1
states following
March 2024
most recently cited

32 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 55 later decisions — most recently March 2024 · most notably Clark v. Coats & Clark, Inc. (1991), Cabalceta v. Standard Fruit Co. (1989)

32 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

21019861990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on Giglio v. United States · Wainwright v. Sykes · Townsend v. Sain · Bonner v. City of Prichard · Lockett v. Ohio

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 55 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “acceptance of the proffered material into the record would establish beyond any doubt the proper resolution of the pending issue,”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “to supplement the record on appeal to include material not before the district court. Id. at 1474-75. The Ross court set forth the following non-exclusive list of factors it would consider when deciding to supplement the record on appeal: 1) whether”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “the unique powers that federal appellate judges have in the context of habeas corpus actions by virtue of 28 U.S.C. § 2254(a).”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.