Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 785 F.2d 1498 - Turner v. Orr

Turner v. Orr’s Empirical Analysis

785 F.2d 1498 · 1986

Citation profile

26
cited by 26 later decisions
3
states following
August 2017
most recently cited

11 federal appellate · 4 district · 3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently August 2017 · most notably Plyler v. Evatt (1990), Clark v. Housing Authority of Alma (1992)

11 federal appellate · 4 district · 3 state decisions

1001986199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 701 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964) · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 706 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964)

Relies on United States v. ITT Continental Baking Co. · Firefighters Local Union No. 1784 v. Stotts · American Paper Institute, Inc. v. American Electric Power Service Corp. · 103 S. Ct. 200 - United States v. Marathon Pipe Line Co. · Woods v. Covington County Bank

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “First, although there need not be proof of actual wrongdoing, "there must be at least a reasonable possibility that some specifically identifiable impropriety did occur." Second, "a court must also find that the likelihood of public suspicion or obloquy outweighs the social interest which will be served by a lawyer’s continued participation in a particular case.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.