Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 785 F.2d 252 - Superior Oil Co. v. Fulmer

Superior Oil Co. v. Fulmer’s Empirical Analysis

785 F.2d 252 · 1986

Citation profile

216
cited by 216 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
3
states following
October 2003
most recently cited

82 federal appellate · 41 district · 3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 216 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently October 2003 · most notably Hj Inc v. Northwestern Bell Telephone Company (1989), California Architectural Building Products, Inc. v. Franciscan Ceramics, Inc. (1987)

82 federal appellate · 41 district · 3 state decisions

2020198619902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Ohio Bureau of Employment Services v. Hodory · Sedima Sprl v. Imrex Company Inc · United States v. Turkette · Iannelli v. United States · S.S. Zoe Colocotroni v. Puerto Rico

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 216 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “requires more than one 'racketeering activity' and the threat of continuing activity to be effective. It is this factor of continuity plus relationship which combines to produce a pattern.”
    36 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “'[i]t places a real strain on the language to speak of a single fraudulent effort, implemented by several fraudulent acts, as a "pattern of racketeering activity.”
    10 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “differs from the other provisions in Sec. 1961 in that it states that a pattern”
    9 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.