Paske v. Fitzgerald’s Empirical Analysis
785 F.3d 977 · 2015
Citation profile
3 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act)) · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 701 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964)
Relies on Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc. · Garcetti v. Ceballos · 134 S. Ct. 2369 - Lane v. Franks · Lee v. Kansas City Southern Railway Co. · Watts v. Kroger Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) he is a member of a protected class, (2) he was qualified for the position at issue, (3) he was the subject of an adverse employment action, and (4) he was treated less favorably because of his membership in that protected class than were other similarly situated employees who were not members of the protected class, under nearly identical circumstances.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“Burrell v. Dr. Pepper/Seven Up Bottling Grp., Inc. , 482 F.3d 408 , 411-12 (5th Cir. 2007). To establish his prima facie case, Jiang must show that he”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.