Commander v. BASF Corp.’s Empirical Analysis
1992
Citation profile
2 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1332 (Class Action Fairness Act of 2005)
Relies on Corbitt v. Diamond M. Drilling Co. · Polozola v. Garlock, Inc. · 488 So. 2d 982 - Soverign Ins. Co. v. Texas Pipe Line Co. · 563 So. 2d 258 - Perkins v. Rubicon, Inc. · 563 So. 2d 248 - Rodrigue v. LeGros
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“claims [or] suits ... for or on account of any injury to ... persons ... which occurs in any way, directly or indirectly, as the result of Contractor's prosecution of the work.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“the result of the contractor's prosecution of the work”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.