Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 785 NE2D 320 - Fisher v. State

Fisher v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2003

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
June 2004
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Jones v. Barnes · Wright v. State · Festo Corp. v. Shoketsu Kinzoku Kogyo Kabushiki Co. · Timberlake v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the state of the law clearly requiring instructions for inherently lesser-included offenses was not settled until after Fisher's direct appeal had been decided”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “fault appellate counsel for choosing to raise issues that may have appeared at the time to serve Fisher's interests more effectively.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.