Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 785 N.E.2d 621 - Thacker v. Bartlett

Thacker v. Bartlett’s Empirical Analysis

2003

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
2
states following
March 2019
most recently cited

14 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Browning v. Walters · Dixon v. Siwy · Browning v. Walters · 179 Ind. App. 25 - Parrett v. Lebamoff · Constantine v. City-County Council of Marion County

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “When an action is pending before a court of competent jurisdiction, other courts must defer to that court's extant authority over the case. Courts observe this deference in the interests of fairness to litigants, comity between and among the courts of this state, and judicial efficiency. Trial Rule 12(B)(8) implements these principles. This rule applies where the parties, subject matter, and remedies of the competing actions are precisely the same, and it also applies when they are only substantially the same.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “When a motion to dismiss is sustained for failure to state a claim under subdivision (B)(6) of this rule the pleading may be amended onee as of right pursuant to Rule 15(A) within ten [10] days after service of notice of the court's order sustaining the motion and thereafter with permission of the court pursuant to such rule.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.