King v. People’s Empirical Analysis
1990
Citation profile
48 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 48 later decisions — most recently September 2021 · most notably State v. Muttart (2007), The PEOPLE of the State of Colorado, Petitioner/Cross-Respondent v. Wayne Robert STEWART, Respondent/Cross-Petitioner. (2002)
48 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Steagald v. United States · Hullum v. United States · United States v. Iron Shell · United States v. Renville · People v. Lowe
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 48 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(Emphasis added). A statement made for purposes of”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“abolish{ed] the distinction between the doctor 'who is consulted for the purpose of treatment' and the doctor who examines a party 'for the purpose of diagnosis only,' even though the latter 'is consulted only in order to testify as a witness.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“if its probative value is substantially outweighed by the danger of unfair prejudice, confusion of the issues, or misleading the jury, or by considerations of undue delay, waste of time, or needless presentation of cumulative evidence.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.