Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 785 So. 2d 531 - Bowe v. State

785 So. 2d 531 - Bowe v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2001

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
3
states following
February 2019
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Yates v. Gober · United States v. Jackson · 239 Ga. App. 524 - Inglett v. State · Shull v. Com. · 17 Va. App. 585 - Tatum v. Commonwealth

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “If this statement had been offered to “prove the truth of the matter asserted” — that the informant wanted to purchase four cocaine rocks for $40 — then the statement would have been hearsay. See § 90.801(l)(c), Fla. Stat. (2000). However, the prosecution offered the “statement” not to prove the truth of the matter asserted, but to show that the recipient of the numerical message was the defendant, since the numbers appeared on his pager.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.