Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

785 So. 2d 594

Locus v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2001-04-17

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently October 2013

2 state decisions

Relies on Brantley v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2001-04-17

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1We affirm the appellant’s conviction. However, the trial court did not have jurisdiction to hold a restitution hearing once the appellant filed a notice of appeal. See Brantley v. State, 723 So.2d 909 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999). As a result, we reverse and remand for the trial court to conduct another hearing and impose restitution again should it elect to do so.

¶2AFFIRMED in part, REVERSED in part, and REMANDED for further proceedings.

BARFIELD, C.J., WOLF and POLSTON, JJ., concur.
/785/so2d/594 · .json · Public domain