Miller v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2001
Citation profile
7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
September 2015
most recently cited
7 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 707 So. 2d 664 - Sanders v. State · 642 So. 2d 592 - O'HARA v. State · 534 So. 2d 912 - Gosha v. State · Pineda v. State · 683 So. 2d 600 - Miller v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the trial court cannot question prospective jurors on such crucial areas as the presumption of innocence, burden of proof and the right to silence, then prevent counsel from further individual examination under the guise that it would be repetitive.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“concern core issues to be decided by the jury.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“). We thus find that it was an abuse of discretion to preclude appellant from questioning prospective jurors regarding the presumption of innocence and burden of proof in this criminal case. Appellant also contends that the trial court erred in instructing the jury on the resisting arrest without violence charge. Appellant made a timely, written request for a special jury instruction that read:”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Campbell v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.