¶1AFFIRMED. See Gray v. State, 780 So.2d 1042 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001)(rejecting claim that under Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000), habitual offender sentence is unconstitutional — “Apprendi does not apply to enhanced sentences based on prior conviction.”).
785 So. 2d 713
Jacobs v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided May 23, 2001
District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2001-05-23
Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently December 2009
4 state decisions
Relies on Apprendi v. New Jersey · Gray v. State
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 2001-05-23
View the full empirical analysis of this case →