¶1Affirmed. See Rhodes v. State, 701 So.2d 388 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997)(Neither defense attorney nor trial court is required to warn defendant of sentence-enhancing consequences that defendant’s plea will have as to any future crimes defendant may commit; neither trial court nor defense counsel has duty to anticipate defendant’s recidivism.)
785 So. 2d 744
Dixson v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided May 30, 2001
District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2001-05-30
Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently November 2011
3 state decisions
Relies on 701 So. 2d 388 - Rhodes v. State
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 2001-05-30
View the full empirical analysis of this case →