Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 785 SW2D 299 - State v. Anderson

State v. Anderson’s Empirical Analysis

1990

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
July 2010
most recently cited

7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently July 2010

7 state decisions

50199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 21 U.S.C. § 331 (Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act)

Relies on Duren v. Missouri · Logan v. United States · Delaware v. New York · Hallstrom v. Tillamook County · Gonzales v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[n]otwithstanding ... [R]ule 24.07, two or more offenses may be charged in the same indictment or information in a separate count for each offense if the offenses charged, whether felonies or misdemeanors or infractions, or any combination thereof, are of the same or similar character or are based on the same act or transaction or on two or more acts or transactions connected together or constituting parts of a common scheme or plan.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[a]ll offenses that are of the same or similar character or based on two or more acts that are part of the same transaction or on two or more acts or transactions that are connected or that constitute parts of a common scheme or plan may be charged in the same indictment or information in separate counts.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “[d]efendant's failure to request the continuance by written motion accompanied by an affidavit is sufficient grounds to affirm the trial court's ruling”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.