Phillips v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1990
Citation profile
1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
March 1992
most recently cited
1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on McMahon v. State · Moore v. State · LaRose v. State · Barber v. State · Evans v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“To entitle movant to an evidentiary hearing on his Rule 24.035 motion, “that motion must allege: (1) facts, not conclusions, warranting relief; (2) facts that raise matters not refuted by the files and records of the case; and (3) the matters complained of resulted in prejudice to [movant].” Straughann v. State, 779 S.W.2d 256, 257 [2] (Mo.App.1989).”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Peterson v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.