Earls v. King’s Empirical Analysis
1990
Citation profile
17 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 323
Relies on STATE EX REL. JEWISH HOSPITAL, ETC. v. Buder · State Ex Rel. Schneider v. Stewart · Fair v. Agur · Oakland Municipal Improvement League v. City of Oakland · Webster v. Joplin Water Works Company
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[T]he cause of action shall not be deemed to accrue when the wrong is done or the technical breach of contract or duty occurs, but when the damage resulting therefrom is sustained and is capable of ascertainment ...”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“When a person desires to raise an issue as to the legal existence of any party or the capacity of any party to sue or be sued or the authority of a party to sue or be sued in a representative capacity, the person shall do so by specific negative averment, which shall include such supporting particulars as are peculiarly within the pleader’s knowledge.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[I]f death occurs after appeal and before final determination thereof and substitution or motion therefor is not made in the appellate court where the appeal is pending within nine months after the first published notice of letters testamentary or of administration, the appeal shall be dismissed as to the deceased party.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Reese
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.