Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 786 F.2d 1019 - United States v. Jonas

United States v. Jonas’s Empirical Analysis

786 F.2d 1019 · 1986

Citation profile

19
cited by 19 later decisions
3
states following
February 2016
most recently cited

5 federal appellate · 13 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently February 2016

5 federal appellate · 13 state decisions

801986199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1341 (White-Collar Crime Penalty Enhancement Act of 2002) · 18 U.S.C. § 1343 · 18 U.S.C. § 2314

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Bruton v. United States · Berkemer v. McCarty · Rideout v. United States · Garrett v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The only relevant inquiry is how a reasonable man in the suspect's position would have understood his position.”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.