United States v. Doyle’s Empirical Analysis
786 F.2d 1440 · 1986
Citation profile
19 federal appellate · 1 district · 4 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 29 later decisions — most recently August 2024 · most notably United States v. Antoine (1990), Kev, Inc. v. Kitsap County (1986)
19 federal appellate · 1 district · 4 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 16 U.S.C. § 1538 (§ 9 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973) · 16 U.S.C. § 3372 · 28 U.S.C. § 753
Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Boyce Motor Lines, Inc. v. United States · Rodriguez v. United States · Smith v. Francis, Warden · United States v. Green
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“had the opportunity to listen to all or any portion of each tape because each was admitted in evidence in its entirety. We presume the jury considered all available evidence in its deliberations.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“without knowing which portions of these tapes were played at trial, this court cannot adequately evaluate his claim that there was insufficient evidence to convict.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.