Ward v. Downtown Development Authority’s Empirical Analysis
786 F.2d 1526 · 1986
Citation profile
8 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently April 2005
8 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))
Relies on Board of Regents of State Colleges v. Roth · Hishon v. King & Spalding · Greenholtz v. Inmates of Nebraska Penal and Correctional Complex · Martinez v. California · Webb's Fabulous Pharmacies, Inc. v. Beckwith
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“conditions set forth in the legislative grant of its authority,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Ruiz
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.