Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 786 F.2d 349 - Blue v. Rose R

Blue v. Rose R’s Empirical Analysis

786 F.2d 349 · 1986

Citation profile

33
cited by 33 later decisions
5
states following
March 2015
most recently cited

13 federal appellate · 2 district · 5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 33 later decisions — most recently March 2015 · most notably Sylla-Sawdon v. Uniroyal Goodrich Tire Co. (1995), Usery Gourley (1997)

13 federal appellate · 2 district · 5 state decisions

2501986199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on In re Disbarment of Carnow · Admiral Theatre Corporation v. Douglas Theatre Company Jsb · Grissum v. Reesman · Martin v. Yeoham · Miller v. Higgins

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 33 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[i]t is fundamental that it is within the trial court's discretionary power whether to allow the testimony of witnesses not listed prior to trial. (citations omitted). A ruling by the district court pertaining to this matter will be overturned only if there is a clear abuse of discretion.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “the difference between the actual value of the property and what its value would have been if [the property] had been as represented.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “A ruling by the district court pertaining to this matter will be overturned only if there is a clear abuse of discretion.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.