Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 786 F.2d 364 - Loggins v. Frey

Loggins v. Frey’s Empirical Analysis

786 F.2d 364 · 1986

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
1
states following
October 2008
most recently cited

5 federal appellate · 3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently October 2008

5 federal appellate · 3 state decisions

60198619902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 636

Relies on Johnson v. Zerbst · Wainwright v. Sykes · Ohio v. Roberts · Ungar v. Sarafite · Morris v. Slappy

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “'[o]nly an unreasoning and arbitrary "insistence upon expeditiousness in the face of a justifiable request for delay”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.