Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 786 F.2d 586 - Flynn v. United States

Flynn v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

786 F.2d 586 · 1986

Citation profile

37
cited by 37 later decisions
1
states following
November 2009
most recently cited

17 federal appellate · 7 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 37 later decisions — most recently November 2009 · most notably Keado v. United States (1988), Philadelphia Reading Corporation v. United States (1991)

17 federal appellate · 7 district · 1 state decisions

200198619902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 26 U.S.C. § 1 (Airport and Airway Extension Act of 2008) · 26 U.S.C. § 6213 · 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 28 U.S.C. § 1340

Relies on United States Accardi v. Shaughnessy · Weinberger v. Romero-Barcelo · Enochs v. Williams Packing & Navigation Co. · Bob Jones University v. Simon · Rondeau v. Mosinee Paper Corp.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 37 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “grant injunctive relief under specified conditions. Id. Combining Congress' use of the conditional with Romero-Barcelo, we held that relief was not mandatory simply because the statutory conditions were met, but instead lies within the discretion of the court. Id. Therefore, we found”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “no reason to cast off those principles that traditionally have informed the exercise of a court's broad equity powers,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “Waiver of Restrictions on Assessment and Collection of Deficiency in Tax and Acceptance of Overassessment.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.