Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 786 F.2d 704 - Batiste v. Blackburn

Batiste v. Blackburn’s Empirical Analysis

786 F.2d 704 · 1986

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
February 1994
most recently cited

5 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Relies on In the Matter of Samuel Winship · 312 So. 2d 318 - State v. Elam · Adams v. Murphy

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Under such a definition, no longer must a robber use a dangerous weapon to be considered armed; according to the trial court, he need only terrify his victim into believing that a weapon exists — regardless of the inaccuracy of the belief — to commit armed robbery.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.