United States v. Spilotro’s Empirical Analysis
786 F.2d 808 · 1986
Citation profile
5 federal appellate · 2 district · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently May 2015
5 federal appellate · 2 district · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1952 · 18 U.S.C. § 3142 (Bail Reform Act of 1984) · 18 U.S.C. § 3143 (Bail Reform Act of 1984) · 18 U.S.C. § 3145 (Bail Reform Act of 1984) · 18 U.S.C. § 3146 (Bail Reform Act of 1984) · 18 U.S.C. § 3147 (Bail Reform Act of 1984) · 18 U.S.C. § 371 · 28 U.S.C. § 1291
Relies on Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp. · Bell v. Wolfish · United States v. O'Brien · Murphy v. Hunt · Stack v. Boyle
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“We therefore hold that § 3146(e) granted the court with original jurisdiction over the offense charged the authority to amend sua sponte and at any time the conditions of release. To hold otherwise would sharply restrict the discretion of the trial court to determine pretrial matters. In addition, requiring a remand of the case to the releasing judicial officer in order to amend conditions of release would waste limited judicial resources.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.