Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 786 F.2d 959 - Tatum v. Christensen

Tatum v. Christensen’s Empirical Analysis

786 F.2d 959 · 1986

Citation profile

46
cited by 46 later decisions
July 2002
most recently cited

40 federal appellate · 2 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 46 later decisions — most recently July 2002 · most notably Iaea v. Sunn (1986), United States v. Sanchez (1990)

40 federal appellate · 2 district ·

220198619902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1621 · 18 U.S.C. § 471 (Counterfeit Deterrence Act of 1992)

Relies on Haines v. Kerner · Johnson v. Righetti · Polizzi v. United States · Lonnie Gene Chatman v. J. Marquez · Yuckert v. Heckler

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 46 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Five years after each parolee’s release on parole, the Commission shall terminate supervision over such parolee unless it is determined, after a hearing ..., that such supervision should not be terminated because there is a likelihood that the parolee will engage in conduct violating any criminal law.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “likelihood that the parolee will engage in conduct violating any criminal law.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “purely legal, central to the case, and important to the public.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.