Lash v. Lemke’s Empirical Analysis
786 F.3d 1 · 2015
Citation profile
5 federal appellate · 16 district ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291
Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Ashcroft v. Iqbal · Harlow v. Fitzgerald · Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics · Anderson v. Creighton
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“opposing parties tell two different stories, one of which is blatantly contradicted by the record, so that no reasonable jury could believe it, a court should not adopt that version of the facts for purposes of ruling on a motion for summary judgment.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“Tolan v. Cotton , --- U.S. ----, 134 S.Ct. 1861 , 1866, 188 L.Ed.2d 895 (2014) (per curiam), and”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“clearly established ... in light of the specific context of the case.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.