United States v. Mathis’s Empirical Analysis
786 F.3d 1068 · 2015
Citation profile
14 federal appellate · 2 district ·
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3553 · 18 U.S.C. § 3583 · 18 U.S.C. § 922 (Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act) · 18 U.S.C. § 924
Relies on Taylor v. United States · Shepard v. United States · Descamps v. United States · United States v. Williams · United States v. Howard
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Whether [such locations] amount to alternative elements or merely alternative means to fulfilling an element,”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence“must apply the modified categorical approach”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence“Any person, having the intent to commit a felony, assault or theft therein, who, having no right, license or privilege to do so, enters an occupied structure, such occupied structure not being open to the public, or who remains therein after it is closed to the public or after the person’s right, license or privilege to be there has expired, or any person having such intent who breaks an occupied structure, commits burglary.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.