Archuleta v. Hopper’s Empirical Analysis
786 F.3d 1340 · 2015
Citation profile
4 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 5 U.S.C. § 1101 (Civil Service Miscellaneous Amendments) · 5 U.S.C. § 1103 · 5 U.S.C. § 1104 · 5 U.S.C. § 1204 · 5 U.S.C. § 1302 · 5 U.S.C. § 3301 (Federal Vacancies Reform Act of 1998) · 5 U.S.C. § 3302 · 5 U.S.C. § 7511
Relies on Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. · Griffin v. Oceanic Contractors, Inc. · Federal Election Commission v. Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee · Andrus v. Glover Construction Co. · United States v. Smith
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) [is] arbitrary, capricious, an abuse of discretion, or otherwise not consistent with law; (2) [was] not made consistent with required procedures; or (3) [is] unsupported by substantial evidence.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“We review the [MSPB]'s legal determinations, including its interpretation of a statute, de novo.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.