Mock v. Potlatch Corp.’s Empirical Analysis
1992
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 1 district · 6 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently January 2018
1 federal appellate · 1 district · 6 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1332 (Class Action Fairness Act of 2005)
Relies on Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · First Nat. Bank of Ariz. v. Cities Service Co. · Robert C. Hahn v. Francis W. Sargent · 104 Wash. 2d 677 - Bradley v. American Smelting and Refining Co. · 369 So. 2d 523 - Borland v. Sanders Lead Co., Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[I]f the intangible invasion causes substantial damage to the plaintiff's property . . . an action for trespass may be brought.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“Any person who, without permission of the owner, or the owner’s agent, enters upon the real property of another person which property is posted with “No Trespassing” signs or other notices of like meaning, spaced at intervals of not less than one (1) notice per six hundred sixty (660) feet along such real property; or who cuts down or carries off any wood or underwood, tree or timber, or girdles, or otherwise injures any tree or timber on the land of another person, or on the street or highway in front of any person’s house, village, or city lot, or cultivated, grounds; or on the commons or public grounds of or in any city or town, or on the street or highway in front thereof, without lawful authority, is liable to the owner of such land, or to such city or town, for treble the amount of -damages which may be assessed therefor or fifty dollars ($50.00), plus a reasonable attorneys’ fee which shall be taxed as costs, in any civil action brought to enforce the terms of this act if the plaintiff prevails.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[T]he Idaho statutes governing trespass only apply when the trespass is shown to have been wilful and intentional, and the wronged party seeks treble damages therefor, as authorized by Section 6-202. In all other circumstances, the common law principles relating to trespass actions apply. The court is unaware of any recent Idaho cases to the contrary, and the 1976 amendments to the statutes did nothing to alter this interpretation ....”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.