Ingram v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1990
Citation profile
16 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently July 2022
16 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Conley v. Gibson · 100 Wash. 2d 421 - Petersen v. State · 144 Wis. 2d 223 - Schuster v. Altenberg · Bartlett v. American National Bank & Trust Co. of Sapulpa · Frazier v. Bryan Memorial Hospital Authority
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The state or a political subdivision shall not be liable if a loss or claim results from: * * * (14) Any loss to any person covered by any workers’ compensation act or any employer’s liability act;" (Emphasis added.)”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“The following offices, positions and personnel shall not be considered state employees except as otherwise provided by law: [[Image here]] 4. Officers and members of the Oklahoma National Guard, as such.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“At a very minimum, she [plaintiff] has stated a claim for bodily injury that is founded on negligent entrustment of dangerous implements to the attacker, accomplished through unnamed State agents. . ..”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.