786 So. 2d 1162 - Johnson v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2001
Citation profile
15
cited by 15 later decisions
1
states following
September 2016
most recently cited
15 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 697 So. 2d 84 - Standard Jury Instructions in Crim. Cases · 733 So. 2d 955 - Miller v. State · Dakes v. State · State v. Laster · 737 So. 2d 555 - Johnson v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A person may be guilty of this offense if he or she entered into or remained in areas of the premises which he or she knew or should have known were not open to the public.”
8 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Cueto v. State · Davis v. State“[w]hether or not consent may have been withdrawn ... is not an issue. The only relevant question is whether the premises were open to the public at the time the defendant entered or remained with the intent to commit an offense therein.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.