Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

786 So. 2d 1232

Vernon v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2001-06-08

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently June 2010

1 state decisions

Relies on 744 So. 2d 1215 - State v. Huggins

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2001-06-08

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

NORTHCUTT, Judge.

¶1Darren Vernon pleaded no contest to numerous crimes. At his sentencing hearing, and in this appeal, he argued that he could not be sentenced as a prison releasee reoffender for several burglaries, all of which were of unoccupied dwellings. Our supreme court agreed with his position in State v. Huggins, 744 So.2d 1215 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001). Accordingly we reverse his prison releasee reoffender sentences for the burglaries and remand for resentenc-ing. We note that Vernon was also sentenced as a prison releasee reoffender for several counts of grand theft, grand theft of a motor vehicle and criminal mischief. None of these crimes qualifies a defendant for sentencing as a prison releasee reoffen-der. § 775.082, Fla. Stat. (1999). Those sentences are also reversed and remanded for resentencing.

PATTERSON, C.J., and DANAHY, PAUL W. (Senior) Judge, Concur.
/786/so2d/1232 · .json · Public domain