786 So. 2d 200 - State v. Groce’s Empirical Analysis
2001
Citation profile
1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
February 2009
most recently cited
1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · 603 So. 2d 731 - State v. Hearold · 695 So. 2d 1367 - State v. Kennerson · 464 So. 2d 737 - State v. Perez · 634 So. 2d 1168 - State v. Davis
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“As instructed by State v. Hearold, 603 So.2d 731 (La.1992), we always take up sufficiency of the evidence assignments first. Regarding the sufficiency review, and the standard of review required by Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307 , 99 S.Ct. 2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979), the court in State v. Kennerson, 96-1518, p. 5 (La.App. 3 Cir. 5/7/97); 695 So.2d 1367, 1371 (citations omitted), said: When the issue of sufficiency of evidence is raised on appeal, the critical inquiry of the reviewing court is whether, after viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime proven beyond a reasonable doubt. It is the role of the fact finder to weigh the respective credibility of the witnesses, and therefore, the appellate court should not second guess the credibility determinations of the triers of fact beyond the sufficiency evaluations under the Jackson standard of review.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. CSD
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.