Cooper v. Cooper’s Empirical Analysis
2001
Citation profile
1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 591 So. 2d 342 - Schroeder v. Board of Sup'rs · Berzas v. Oxy USA, Inc. · 463 So. 2d 1287 - Keelen v. State, Dept. of Culture, Recreation & Tourism · 567 So. 2d 1097 - Monteville v. Terrebonne Par. Con. Gov't · 715 So. 2d 108 - Orea v. Brannan
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“means the possessor of a fee interest, a tenant, lessee, occupant or person in control of the premises. (3)”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.