786 So. 2d 372 - Sharp v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2001
Citation profile
61
cited by 61 later decisions
1
states following
May 2019
most recently cited
61 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Barker v. Wingo · 691 So. 2d 948 - Herring v. State · Taylor v. State · 535 So. 2d 1371 - Vickery v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 61 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The possibility of impairment of the defense is the most serious consideration in determining whether the defendant has suffered prejudices as a result of delay.”
10 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Moore v. State · Johnson v. State“[u]nless good cause be shown, and a continuance duly granted by the court, all offenses for which indictments are presented to the court shall be tried no later than two hundred seventy (270) days after the accused has been arraigned.”
7 later decisions quote this exact passage“(1) the length of delay, (2) the reasons for the delay, (3) assertion of his right to a speedy trial, and (4) prejudice to the defense.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.