Wilson v. Teng’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
15 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 599 So. 2d 1120 - Culbreth v. Woodham Plumbing Co., Inc. · 681 So. 2d 226 - Brown v. Whitaker Contracting Corp. · 611 So. 2d 313 - Continental Eagle Corp. v. Mokrzycki · 342 So. 2d 1 - Oliver v. Brock · 570 So. 2d 1209 - Doe v. Swift
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“' Id. , quoting Robinson v. Hank Roberts, Inc. , 514 So.2d 958 , 961 (Ala. 1987). However, when a party submits a subsequent affidavit merely to clarify his or her answers to ambiguous questions asked by counsel during a deposition or other prior sworn proceeding or to supply information not necessarily sought by questions asked at the deposition or other prior sworn proceeding, the trial court should consider the subsequent affidavit. See, e.g. Rickard v. Shoals Distrib., Inc. , 645 So.2d 1378 , 1382-83 (Ala. 1994); and Tittle v. Alabama Power Co. , 570 So.2d 601 , 606-07 (Ala. 1990).”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage“'a court may not determine the credibility of witnesses on a motion for summary judgment.'”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.