Gonzalez v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2001
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 7 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Lilly v. Virginia · 283 So. 2d 1 - State v. Dixon · 714 So. 2d 411 - Urbin v. State · 571 So. 2d 415 - Campbell v. State · 476 So. 2d 130 - Bertolotti v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“In order for a prosecutor's comments to be deemed prejudicial, they must `vitiate the trial or so poison the minds of the jurors that [the defendant] did not receive a fair trial.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“Gonzalez has failed to demonstrate that the comments either individually or collectively amount to fundamental error so as to entitle him to any relief.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.