786 So. 2d 595 - Harvey v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2001
Citation profile
23
cited by 23 later decisions
1
states following
September 2008
most recently cited
23 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Anders v. California · Heggs v. State · 760 So. 2d 89 - Maddox v. State · 760 So. 2d 114 - Leonard v. State · 758 So. 2d 667 - Salters v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“While the supreme court in Maddox v. State, 760 So.2d 89 (Fla.2000), indicated that the concept of fundamental sentencing error survived the enactment of the Criminal Appeal Reform Act of 1996 and the 1996 amendments to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(b), the court also indicated that, for defendants whose appeals fall outside the window period identified in Maddox as having closed on the effective date of their most recent amendments to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(b) in Amendments II, there would no longer be the concept of fundamental sentencing error because the procedural mechanism provided by the most recent amendments to the rule would allow for raising any alleged sentencing errors prior to the filing of the first appellate brief.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Garrett v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.