Anderson v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 491 So. 2d 1129 - State v. DiGuilio · 589 So. 2d 287 - State v. Cabrera · 438 So. 2d 774 - Johnson v. State · 576 So. 2d 322 - Holiday Inns, Inc. v. Shelburne · McMullen v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) that the opinion evidence be helpful to the trier of fact; (2) that the witness be qualified as an expert; (3) that the opinion evidence can be applied to evidence offered at trial; and (4) that evidence, although technically relevant, must not present a substantial danger of unfair prejudice that outweighs its probative value.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.