Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 786 So. 2d 606 - State v. Scott

786 So. 2d 606 - State v. Scott’s Empirical Analysis

2001

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
1
states following
March 2016
most recently cited

11 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Thompson v. Keohane · Lewis v. Gober · Mims v. Browning Manufacturing · Peoples v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Id. at 608 . Connor strongly supports the State's position that Pitts was not taken into custody by the officers at his apartment. (c) The Purpose, Place, and Manner of the Interrogation”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[a]lthough [police] did not tell [defendant] she was free to leave, there [was] nothing to suggest that her freedom of movement was curtailed in any manner”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “Mr. Cillo responded in the affirmative. We conclude that a reasonable person placed in the same position would not believe that”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.