Brown v. Brown’s Empirical Analysis
2001
Citation profile
1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 458 So. 2d 381 - Mouzon v. Mouzon · 610 So. 2d 1097 - Roberts v. Orpheum Corp. · 659 So. 2d 1204 - Archbold Health Serv. v. Future Tech · 487 So. 2d 1109 - Laney v. Laney · Tipton v. Van Schouwen
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[U]nless a nonresident [spouse] voluntarily appears and waives all jurisdictional objections, or facts establishing minimum contacts sufficient to support a basis for long arm jurisdiction over the nonresident [spouse] are shown to exist, service obtained pursuant to 48.194 does not provide in personam jurisdiction with respect to matters of child and spousal support.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“voids any service of process . . . with the result that there . . . [is] no in personam jurisdiction over the respondent,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“Final Judgment of Dissolution of Marriage.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.